ATOMERA - Our top pick in the 4th Quarter!

Atomera ( ATOM ) - Experts From Synopsys, Intel, SK Hynix, Applied Materials, AKM, ST Micro, Notre Dame, And U Cal Berkeley Have Validated The Technology.

Other Tickers: INTC , AMAT , QCOM , ACLS , STM

• Atomera, formerly Mears Technologies, is a technology company targeting the semiconductor industry.

• Our research, backed by numerous well documented and credible sources, shows the technology is 100% credible.

• We believe the company is on the verge of adoption and see significant upside potential as the stock has a small float and high short interest.

• In this blog we will refute, with clear documentation, any debate on the validity of the technology.

Atomera, formerly Mears Technologies, is a technology company targeting one of the most important industries in our economy - semiconductors. The company's technology - Mears Silicon Technology or MST, offers a semiconductor manufacturer the ability to produce chips which are smaller and more powerful. The organization is an IP license company that has a vast patent portfolio encompassing 298 patents granted or pending.

In this blog we will address why the company's technology is credible. We do not believe anonymous sources are credible, so we will provide documented content from industry sources to validate our investment thesis.

As mentioned prior the company has 298 patents granted or pending. This moat of protection around the IP should provide any investor their first clue as to the validity of the technology.

Please view in the link below all of the patent protection surrounding the technology:

Atomera - Patent Protection

Now, should the reader of this blog feel 298 patents granted or pending is not credible, let's discuss further content.

Tsu-Jae King Liu is the current Dean of the College of Engineering at University of California Berkeley and she is also on the board of Intel. Ever hear of Intel ( INTC )?

Why is Professor Liu important to the story of Atomera? Not only does she have her name tied to an Atomera patent, but then she additionally has spoken directly to the industry about Atomera's technology and the benefits.

Do Intel board members typically place their name on a patent for technology that is not credible?

Why would a distinguished Professor and Intel board member voluntarily speak at an industry conference on Atomera's technology IF it was not credible?

Synopsys ( SNPS ), a 46 billion in market cap organization, that works exclusively with the semiconductor industry also clearly believes Atomera's technology is credible.

Not only is Synopsys a key technology partner to Atomera, but in the fall of 2020 the organization hosted a webinar directly to their Korean clients discussing Atomera's technology:

Synopsys works directly with Samsung, TSMC, SK Hynix, and every other global semiconductor company. Do 46 billion dollar companies like Synopsys typically hold webinars to discuss technology that is not credible with their own clients?

Here is a link to the webinar:

https://youtu.be/53JD0dVyyPE

The speakers who conducted the webinar are below. With their backgrounds, do you think they would discuss a technology that is not credible?

Ok, if 298 patents, an Intel board member promoting the technology, and then an industry giant like Synopsys stating the technology is clearly credible is not enough for you - please continue to read.

Maybe you are a nerd like me and like scientific peer reviewed research papers written by credible industry giants?

Ever hear of AKM - Asahi Kasei Microsystems? This industry giant is a pioneer in semiconductor chip advancement.

Their website:

Asahi Kasei Microdevices (AKM) | AKM

AKM felt Atomera's technology was credible enough to have their company name tied to a peer reviewed scientific paper in August of 2020:

The actual paper:

https://atomera.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/IEEE_IPFA2020.pdf

Axcelis Technologies ( ACLS ), a 1.6 billion in market cap company, that is an equipment manufacturer for the semiconductor industry also believes Atomera's technology is credible. Per the company's financials the two biggest clients ACLS works with are Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation ( SMIC ) and Samsung - ever hear of Samsung?

From the company's 2020 annual statement:

ACLS co-authored a peer reviewed scientific paper on Atomera's technology:

The actual article can be found:

https://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1.5144507

SK Hynix, the 4th largest semiconductor company globally, also decided to co-author a peer reviewed scientific paper on Atomera's technology:

The paper can be found below co-authored by SK Hynix:

The full research paper is in the link below:

https://aip.scitation.org/doi/full/10.1063/1.4931431

Do you need more? We got it!

You can find a plethora of additional peer reviewed scientific research papers right on the Atomera website. These papers are co-authored by the likes of Synopsys, University of Notre Dame, University of California, and various other non-biased subject matter experts in the space:

Publications | Atomera

Ok, perhaps all this documentation is not enough for you?

Infineon Technologies ( IFNNY ), a 52 billion dollar semiconductor manufacturer, recently issued this patent directly citing Atomera's technology:

Would you like more?:

The former CFO & General Counsel from Synopsys sits on the Atomera board:

Duy-Loan T. Le also sits on Atomera's board. Ms. Le is the first, and only, woman ever in Texas Instrument's history to achieve the title of Senior Fellow. You think she would be part of a technology that is not credible?:

Robert Mears, the inventor of Atomera's technology, has more than 30 years of experience and co-authored 250 publications.

A recent research note from Richard Shannon, CFA, with Craig Hallum, states the following:

As one of the top semiconductor analysts in the space we doubt highly Richard would put his reputation on the line if the technology was not credible:

We hope the above content provides you enough comfort in knowing Atomera's technology is more than credible. For the sake of size, we kept this blog short & sweet. For the curious reader who desires even more factual data, there is plenty more for you to read. Anyone, including paid short hit pieces citing "anonymous sources", are simply not telling you the truth.

So, the question of the day:

Is the United States Patent Office, various other patent offices globally, an Intel board member, Synopsys, AKM, SK Hynix, Samsung, Applied Materials, Richard Shannon, University of California Berkley, Notre Dame University, and a multitude of other 3rd party credible sources all part of some grand scheme to "sell" you on Atomera's technology?

We believe the only risk with Atomera stock is patience.